Tag Archives: Julian Assange

Constitution Will Be Victim In Zealous Effort to Go After Assange and Wikileaks

InfoWars

Kurt Nimmo

InfoWars

It looks like Obama’s Justice Department may not prosecute Julian Assange. Fact of the matter is that Assange and Wikileaks are beyond the reach of the Justice Department.

Experts on whistleblower leaks and internet security issues say the Obama administration faces a daunting and perhaps insurmountable series of legal and practical challenges if it wants to take out Wikileaks.

Because the the 1917 Espionage Act is problematic and its use failed when the government tried to prosecute Daniel Ellsberg in the Pentagon Papers case, a number of politicians have decided to enact legislation criminalizing the act of whistle-blowing.

The so-called Securing Human Intelligence and Enforcing Lawful Dissemination (Shield) Bill was introduced by Peter King, a Republican from New York, who will become chairman of the House Intelligence Committee when the new House of Representatives with a Republican majority convenes in January.

The bill is ostensibly designed to make it illegal to publish the names of military or intelligence community informants. It mirrors a previous bill introduced by in the Senate by Joe Lieberman, Scott Brown and Susan Collins. Both bills seek to criminalize ex post facto the activity of Wikileaks and its founder, Julian Assange.

Hearings on the bills will not begin until a new Congress convenes in January. However, according to officials, the House Judiciary Committee is expected to begin work this Thursday on how the Espionage Act might be modified to give prosecutors the ability to go after enemies of the state who dare leak information to the American people.

Read more>>>

Related story:
Is Treason a Civic Duty?
Assange: “My Convictions are Unfaltering”
Julian Assange’s bail plea exposes double standards in high places

Tagged , , , ,

Is Treason a Civic Duty?

Julian Assange’s mother has said that she is worried about her son as “massive forces” are working against him and insisted that there is “no way” he is guilty of rape, which he is charged with in Sweden.

Thomas Darnstädt

Der Spiegel

Since 9/11, press freedom in the West has come under attack as governments argue that national security is more important than transparency. But the hunt for WikiLeaks is a greater danger to democracy than any information that WikiLeaks might reveal.

Why do we need freedom of the press? The framers of the United States Constitution believed that such a guarantee would be unnecessary — if not dangerous. There are freedoms that we don’t secure through promises, but which we take for ourselves. They are like the air we breathe in a democracy, whose authority is built on public opinion. The democracy that was founded on the basis of such insights is the American democracy. It is an indication of the American revolutionaries’ healthy mistrust in the power of this insight that they would later incorporate freedom of the press into the US Constitution after all.

Today, more than 200 years later, this old idea seems naïve to all too many people in the Western world. Since becoming embroiled in the war against terrorism, the US government has transformed itself into a huge security apparatus. The Washington Post recently reported that 854,000 people in the US government, or more than one-and-a-half times the population of Washington, DC, hold top-secret security clearances — and this under a president who came into office promising a new era of openness in government. An estimated 16 million government documents a year are stamped “top secret,” or not intended for the eyes of ordinary citizens.

In the crisis, the countries of Old Europe are also putting up the barricades. Germany’s constitution, known as the Basic Law, has a far-reaching guarantee of press freedom and was created after World War II on behalf of the US liberators and in the spirit of the American and French revolutions. But in the 10th year after the 9/11 attacks, one German conservative politician has even pondered whether it might not be a good idea to prohibit journalists from reporting on terrorism in too much detail.

Such people would have been beheaded in revolutionary Paris and probably locked up in Philadelphia. When citizens were revolutionaries, the act of demanding freedom of speech was a revolutionary act. Today, in more peaceful times, we would characterize freedom of speech as a civic virtue.

Read more>>>

Related story:
UK Fears Pro-WikiLeaks Attacks on Gov’t Websites
Assange’s mother says ‘massive forces’ working against him
Wikileaks Hacktivists Shut Down Amazon’s European Websites
Iceland may ban MasterCard, Visa over WikiLeaks censorship

Tagged , , ,

The IRS is strong-arming U.S. citizens

The Sheriff of Nottingham

The Muffin Post

The bankrupt and declining U.S. government, through its much feared Internal Revenue Service, is intimidating US citizens to force them to pay more taxes that may likely fund the corporate bailouts, and wars that it has waged for the benefit of special interest groups.

One taxpayer with only a passing relationship to dissident voices recently received notice from the IRS that she was audited for 2007 (the last year in which she earned five figures), and owed the Federal government several thousand dollars.

The taxpayer had previously received a tax refund from the IRS for 2007.

The concerned citizen called up the tax accountant who prepared the return, and inquired through him if there had been a mistake, and was told that the IRS demanded that she pay the sum owed without further explanation.

Like most citizens when dealing with an aggressive IRS, the taxpayer contacted the agency directly. She informed an agent that her current financial situation was dire. She had lost her job and the salary that she currently receives is considerably less than what she earned in 2007.

She recounted that after her 2010 tax obligations, mortgage payment, and health bills, she had very little to pay for food supplies or anything else.

The IRS ordered her to submit to a payment plan which would commence in November, and received a letter to confirm the agreement from the agency.

In the first week of September, the IRS drained the citizen’s bank account of her salary leaving her with a deficit of one penny, and no means to pay her mortgage, buy food, pay for transportation to go to and fro work, and to purchase medication to control a hyper active thyroid, manage her pancreatic disease, and diabetic condition.

Upon notice from the bank of the offending party who had drained her bank account, the citizen contacted the IRS, and noted to an agent that she had negotiated a payment plan which would commence in November, and had received correspondence noting the same.

The angry citizen told the agent that because of the action of the IRS she now had no means to pay for her health medicine, mortgage, or even travel to work.

Her situation is similar to many ordinary Americans these days who are barely surviving from month to month in a suspect economy that is only good to the deep pockets.
The citizen was backed into a position where she was in no mood to tolerate the strong arm of the IRS without question any more.

The IRS agreed to replace the money it had withdrawn from the citizen’s account, which much to her surprise was re-credited within a matter of a couple hours. The action reflects that the government now has the means to dip into U.S. citizens bank accounts at will, and take whatever action it wants surprisingly without judicial review, in a short turn around. But the tax hounds were not finished with the citizen.

A few days later, she received a letter from her bank noting that the IRS had ordered it to withhold 28% of all interest earned on her bank account for tax purposes, which is essentially her current earned income bracket.

Things get much worst.

About two weeks later, the citizen received a letter from the state tax bureau with an order that she owed the state a few more thousand for year 2007.

In conversation with the state tax agent, the citizen learned that the Federal government had informed the state revenue service of a “mistake” in the preparation of the tax return which accounted for the change.

A revelation of this kind shows that powerful forces in both the Federal and State government are now collaborating to strong arm poor Americans to pay every penny of what they supposedly owe in taxes even while the rich and corporate elites are given hand-outs, tax breaks, and are able negotiate substantial tax reductions on what they owe.

For her experiences, this moderate citizen has decided not to lend her support to any of the candidates of the major political parties. Like her, more and more Americans are finding it hard to respect a government who does not care for the welfare and interests of its ordinary people.

Beware of those that you elect for their phone calls and decisions may deprive you of your money and freedom.

Related story:
Mounting Debts by States Stoke Fears of Crisis
Tax Fight Update
Julian Assange’s Swiss bank account closed
Bank protest sparks online campaign to withdraw bank funds on December 7

Tagged , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.