Comments on: “Shakespeare” By Another Name: A Review

By: william S.

william S. — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:33:18 +0000

Hi,
love the review and appreciate the non-attitude whether to be or not to be. Oxfordian or Stratfordian that is. Just been looking for Sh waterways today. You cleared that up neatly.

I think I’ll give his book another go. It lies neglected on my shelf except to raid his sources and index for bits he missed. John Dee and his massive library and influence isn’t mentioned for example.

At last a well-balanced review, thanks.

yours,
Will

By: blacey

blacey — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:25:39 +0000

Hi Charlotte,

Thanks for reading my review! I will correct it as you suggest.

What is your view on this controversy? I hope you find it as fascinating as I do. Personally, I’d love it if if Anderson turned out to be right.

Bruce

By: Bruce Lacey

Bruce Lacey — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:01:40 +0000

Thanks for such a close reading, Charlotte! I’ll submit a correction.

By: Charlotte

Charlotte — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:02:13 +0000

Brilliant review, but I just want to point out an error; Don John, the brother of the Prince of Aragon, was a character in ‘Much Ado About Nothing’, not ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’.

By: Bovaappoils

Bovaappoils — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:45:06 +0000

yo, great name for site)))